Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 31 JULY 2014

Incompatibility – not a sacking offence, usually

One of the most bitter, expensive and protracted employment cases highlights how initially minor tensions can snowball.

New ZealandEmployment and HR

One of the most bitter, expensive and protracted employment cases in New Zealand highlights how initially minor tensions can snowball.

Ms Snowden v Radio New Zealand case is, perhaps, the most stark example in recent times of extreme incompatibility in the workplace. But it started with some tensions in the relationship that were "not particularly serious" and deteriorated into one of the most acrimonious employment disputes to come before the New Zealand courts. Ms Snowden told the Employment Court that she had spent $3.5million in her claims against Radio New Zealand.

The bitter dispute and protracted litigation between Ms Snowden started in late 2002 and lasted nearly 12 years. The Employment Court finally heard the claims and issued a decision in April 2014. One of Ms Snowden's claims against Radio New Zealand is that she had been unjustifiably dismissed in 2005. The Employment Court heard extensive evidence about the way in which the employment relationship

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from