Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 APRIL 2019

Directors liability in the spotlight

The High Court sent a strong message to directors against the dangers of companies continuing to trade whilst insolvent.

New ZealandCriminal Law

Mainzeal Property and Construction Limited (in liq) v Yan & Ors [2019] NZHC 255

When Mainzeal Property and Construction Limited (Mainzeal) collapsed in February 2013, it left behind a raft of unsecured creditors who were jointly owed just over $110 million. The proceedings brought by Mainzeal's liquidators against its former directors were for the effective benefit of these creditors.

The liquidators' principal claim was that the directors had engaged in reckless trading, and in doing so had breached their duties under s 135 of the Companies Act 1993 (Act). In finding that the liquidators' claim was made out and total compensation of $36 million was payable by the directors, the High Court has sent a strong signal against the dangers of companies continuing to trade whilst insolvent.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from