Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 OCTOBER 2018

The Best TV: Advertising Language Or Literal Claim

Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)
Explore more from Global Advertising Lawyers Alliance (GALA)

The finest', ‘the most delicious', ‘the absolute best'. These are expressions you often see in advertisements. Advertisers are given a lot of leeway to use superlatives ...

NetherlandsMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

The finest’, ‘the most delicious’, ‘the absolute best’. These are expressions you often see in advertisements. Advertisers are given a lot of leeway to use superlatives, but where does one draw the line between a manufacturer’s opinion and a literal claim of superior quality? That question was recently raised again in provisional relief proceedings between LG and TPV.

TPV has a licence from Philips to manufacture and sell Philips televisions. TPV lauds one of these televisions as being ‘The best OLED TV you can buy’. TPV showed an EISA designation in several of its advertisements. Each year, EISA (Expert Imaging and Sound Association) confers awards on the best electronics and had conferred the title of ‘best buy’ on that Philips TV. Its competitor, LG, found the slogan misleading and summonsed TPV to court. According to LG, the problem was that the Philips TV had been awarded the title of ‘best buy’, not ‘best product’. The difference between the two is that ‘best

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from