Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 06 OCTOBER 2020

Controller Or Processor? – Court Of Appeal Confirms Tribunal's Decision On Data Processing Roles

GTG Legal
GTG Legal
Contributor
GTG Legal

GTG Legal

Since its founding in 1997, GTG has been at the forefront of Malta’s legal profession, blending...

View firm profile
Explore more from GTG Legal

LeoVegas appealed from the IDPC's decision on the basis that in the contract between the parties, the Affiliate was deemed to act as a controller and LeoVegas the processor.

MaltaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

A contentious matter between gaming operators and affiliates, in most gaming contract negotiations, is determining which of the parties is to be deemed a controller and which is to be deemed a processor.

A recent judgment of the Court of Appeal presided over by Judge Lawrence Mintoff1 upheld a previous decision of the Information and Data Protection Appeals Tribunal ('Tribunal') against LeoVegas Gaming plc ('LeoVegas'). This decision determined that the controller in the relationship between a gaming operator and an affiliate is the gaming operator, on the basis that an affiliate only processes personal data on the instructions of the gaming operator, for which the affiliate works to attract clients.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from