Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 23 JUNE 2022

Sanctions Monitoring Board And Judical Scrutiny

This article imposes upon subject persons a duty of reporting and screening for sanctions.

MaltaGovernment, Public Sector

The First Hall Civil Court presided by Madame Justice Audrey Demicoli, on March 11, 2022, in the case 'Dr Malcolm Mifsud and Dr Cedric Mifsud vs the Sanctions Monitoring Board', held, among other things, that the Sanctions Monitoring Board was a 'public authority' for the purposes of article 469A of Chapter 12 of the laws of Malta, (and subject to judicial scrutiny).

On 29 September 2020, the Sanctions Monitoring Board wrote to the company Aegis Corporate Services Ltd admonishing them for providing services to Mr Arkadiy Rotenberg, a person sanctioned by the EU, by registering his yacht under the Malta flag. The Board stated that Aegis Corporate failed to fulfil its monitoring duties under article 17(6) of the National Interest (Enabling Powers) Act, Chapter 365 of the laws of Malta.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from