Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 APRIL 2024

Disapplying National Law: Case Summary

GVZH Advocates
GVZH Advocates
Contributor
GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates

GVZH Advocates is a modern and sophisticated legal practice comprised of top-tier professionals,...

View firm profile
Explore more from GVZH Advocates

When national legislation undermines the fundamental right to an effective remedy prescribed by European Union standards, the national court must disapply the relative legislation, in so far as necessary.

MaltaEmployment and HR

When national legislation undermines the fundamental right to an effective remedy prescribed by European Union standards, the national court must disapply the relative legislation, in so far as necessary. This is because any national court cannot interpret national legislation which is inconsistent with EU law.

In the recent case C-715/20 (X (Absence de motifs de résiliation)), decided on the 20th of February 2024, the European Court of Justice (the "ECJ") ruled that any national legislation which allows for the reasons for employment termination to be solely provided to permanent employees, undermines the fundamental right to an effective remedy for part-time employees. Therefore, a fixed-term, part-time employee, who is in a comparable situation to another permanent, whole-time employee,1 must also always be informed of the reasons for the termination of their employment contract.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from