Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 MARCH 2016

Piracy, Ransom And General Average

The court made it clear that its judgment should not be construed as applicable in a case of an act of terrorism.

MalaysiaTransport
Jennifer James Ilango
Jennifer James Ilango

In August 2008, the Bunga Melati Dua,1 a vessel owned by MISC,2 was on a voyage from Malaysia to Rotterdam carrying a cargo of biodiesel when it was hijacked by pirates in the Gulf of Aden. The ship and its crew were taken into Somali waters. The vessel was released less than six weeks after her capture on payment of USD2 million in ransom. The value of the vessel and her cargo amounted to USD80 million. It was common ground between the cargo owners and their insurers that the theft of the cargo and seizure by the pirates were insured risks. Some 11 days before the release of the vessel, the cargo owners issued a notice of abandonment, claiming actual total loss or constructive total loss of the cargo. The owners contended that, on the capture of the vessel by the pirates and its removal into Somali waters, the cargo became an actual total loss within the meaning of s 57(1) of the Marine Insurance Act 1906. The High Court of England held that there was no actual total

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from