Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 15 FEBRUARY 2016

The Grim Reaper Cometh, But Which One?

Eyza Farizan Mokhtar examines a fight over the appointment of a provisional liquidator.

MalaysiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Eyza Farizan Mokhtar examines a fight over the appointment of a provisional liquidator

Can a company hasten its impending death by committing suicide? While awaiting death, can a company choose its own executioner?

These were the issues faced by the High Court in Malayan Banking Berhad v Chip Lam Seng Enterprise Berhad [2014] 1 LNS 1583.

On 27 October 2014, the High Court decided that the Respondent could not avoid a compulsory winding up by undertaking a voluntary winding up. In coming to its decision, the High Court also discussed the court's power to appoint a provisional liquidator pending the disposal of a winding up petition.

THE DEATH SENTENCE

The Respondent, Chip Lam Seng Enterprise Berhad, is the holding company of the "Chip Lam Seng" group of companies ("CLS Group"), a family business controlled by one Mr. Tan Keng Beng ("TKB").

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from