Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 MARCH 2024

Setting The Record Straight On Patent Infringement And Damages

Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Explore more from Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.

In 2023, over 400 patent infringement cases were filed in the United States alone. The time, money and energy involved in litigation only emphasizes the critical need to understand the legal details of patents.

LuxembourgIntellectual Property
Dennemeyer
Dennemeyer
Author LinkedIn connections

In 2023, over 400 patent infringement cases were filed in the United States alone. The time, money and energy involved in litigation only emphasizes the critical need to understand the legal details of patents. However, navigating this area can be complex and may seem overwhelming to innovators and businesses.

We break down what patent infringement is, the potential consequences and some steps to help avoid or defend against court actions. If you are in the innovation space, knowledge is key.

What exactly is patent infringement?

Patents are one of the main types of Intellectual Property (IP), granting holders exclusive rights to an invention's manufacture, use, sale and import in a particular jurisdiction for a limited time. Thus, patent infringement occurs when an individual or commercial entity carries out one or more of these actions during this period without the permission of the patent holder.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

UPC CoA Confirms “gold Standard” For Added Matter In Sibio v Abbott

The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court recently issued a decision examining whether omitting an elastomeric sealing member from a patent claim constitutes added matter, applying the EPO's "gold standard" test while emphasizing the importance of functional and structural relationships between features. The ruling provides crucial insight into how the UPC approaches intermediate generalizations and whether its methodology differs from the notoriously strict EPO practice on added subject-matter.
LuxembourgIntellectual Property
HGF Law
HGF Law
Article

G 1/25: When Must The Description Be Adapted To Amended Claims?

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued a landmark decision in G 1/25 "Hydroponics," addressing a fundamental question that has divided practitioners for years: when patent claims are amended during examination, must the description be adapted to match? The ruling establishes that inconsistencies between claims and descriptions only require correction when they result in non-compliance with the European Patent Convention, not merely for achieving formal consistency.
LuxembourgIntellectual Property
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Article

G 1/25: When Must The Description Be Adapted To Amended Claims?

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued a landmark decision in G 1/25 "Hydroponics," addressing a fundamental question that has divided practitioners for years: when patent claims are amended during examination, must the description be adapted to match? The ruling establishes that inconsistencies between claims and descriptions only require correction when they result in non-compliance with the European Patent Convention, not merely for achieving formal consistency.
LuxembourgIntellectual Property
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.