Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JUNE 2019

It's INTA Time Again!

Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Explore more from Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.

INTA returns to Boston for the 141st annual meeting. Visit Dennemeyer at booth #119.

LuxembourgIntellectual Property
Dennemeyer
Dennemeyer
Author LinkedIn connections

INTA returns to Boston for the 141st annual meeting. Visit Dennemeyer at booth #119.

Discover the whole world of Intellectual Property and how we can help you succeed. Meet us at booth #119 in the Boston Convention and Exhibition Center (BCEC) May 18-22, 2019. This year our booth concept focuses on live demos of our IP management software DIAMS iQ and our new AI based semantic patent search software by Octimine. Come and meet our global team of experts to see how we can help you grow.

Test your knowledge everyday by taking our IP Quiz for a chance to win an iPad Air® 3- we've heard it's pretty hard! Let's talk about your business and how we can help you thrive while enjoying a hot cup of barista coffee in our lounge area. Before you leave, take a postcard for your office and send #greetingsfromINTA to everyone you know.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

UPC CoA Confirms “gold Standard” For Added Matter In Sibio v Abbott

The Court of Appeal of the Unified Patent Court recently issued a decision examining whether omitting an elastomeric sealing member from a patent claim constitutes added matter, applying the EPO's "gold standard" test while emphasizing the importance of functional and structural relationships between features. The ruling provides crucial insight into how the UPC approaches intermediate generalizations and whether its methodology differs from the notoriously strict EPO practice on added subject-matter.
LuxembourgIntellectual Property
HGF Law
HGF Law
Article

G 1/25: When Must The Description Be Adapted To Amended Claims?

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued a landmark decision in G 1/25 "Hydroponics," addressing a fundamental question that has divided practitioners for years: when patent claims are amended during examination, must the description be adapted to match? The ruling establishes that inconsistencies between claims and descriptions only require correction when they result in non-compliance with the European Patent Convention, not merely for achieving formal consistency.
LuxembourgIntellectual Property
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Article

G 1/25: When Must The Description Be Adapted To Amended Claims?

The European Patent Office's Enlarged Board of Appeal has issued a landmark decision in G 1/25 "Hydroponics," addressing a fundamental question that has divided practitioners for years: when patent claims are amended during examination, must the description be adapted to match? The ruling establishes that inconsistencies between claims and descriptions only require correction when they result in non-compliance with the European Patent Convention, not merely for achieving formal consistency.
LuxembourgIntellectual Property
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.
Dennemeyer & Associates S.A.