Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 APRIL 2009

The Duty Of Disclosure - Part 2 of 2

Petra for Law and Intellectual Property (PLIP)
Explore more from Petra for Law and Intellectual Property (PLIP)

Despite the onerous nature of the duty of disclosure upon the insured, the situation is ameliorated somewhat by some seven categories of facts which need not be disclosed to the insurer.

JordanInsurance
Mohammed Zaidan
Mohammed Zaidan

1.5 What Need not be Disclosed?

Despite the onerous nature of the duty of disclosure upon the insured, the situation is ameliorated somewhat by some seven categories of facts which need not be disclosed to the insurer:

1.5.1 Facts within the constructive knowledge of insurers.

The proposer need not disclose what is known or assumed to be known by the insurer.113 It is instructive to compare the assumptions of knowledge made by the proposer with the assumptions of knowledge in the insurer.

It is clear law that insurers are assumed to know the practices of the trade they insure,114 but in current affairs the insurer's memory is assumed to be short. In the leading case of Bates v. Hewitt115 the Court decided that, as the insurance of a ship did not in fact realise that the ship was the same one as the confederate cruiser that had come to England four months earlier in a glare of publicity, that should have been brought home to the insurer by the assured.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.