Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 DECEMBER 2008

Opening The Door To Enforcing Nonmonetary Judgments

The common law restriction on enforcing nonmoney judgments (Rule 35(1) of Dicey Morris & Collins) ("Dicey") has been amended in Jersey.

JerseyWealth Management

Brunei and Bandone v Fidelis and Others [2008] JRC152.

Introduction

The common law restriction on enforcing nonmoney judgments (Rule 35(1) of Dicey Morris & Collins) ("Dicey") has been amended in Jersey. The Courts now have a discretion to enforce non-monetary judgments (such as orders for specific performance), which are vital to effective modern day remedies. In doing so, the Jersey Courts have adopted the approach taken in the Canadian and Caymanian Courts.

Facts

In February 2000, the Brunei Investment Agency (the "BIA") and the Government of Brunei Darussalam brought proceedings against Prince Jefri in the High Court of Brunei Darussalam alleging that Prince Jefri had misappropriated over US $15 billion of State funds whilst acting as Minister of Finance for Brunei Darussalam. In May 2000 the proceedings were compromised.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from