Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 APRIL 2012

Landmark Decision Reached On The Validity Of Litigation Funding In Jersey

Commercial litigation has a reputation for being expensive and uncertain and is something which some clients may make a conscious decision to avoid.

JerseyWealth Management

Access to Justice

Commercial litigation has a reputation for being expensive and uncertain and is something which some clients may make a conscious decision to avoid. As with most things, it need not be that way. Litigation funding, in the right case, may provide an answer to an impecunious plaintiff, or at least provide a valuable option worth considering as an alternative to funding a case through to trial from resources at one's own disposal.

Third Party Funding Agreements

Third party funding involves an agreement, (which may take a variety of forms) between a litigant and a professional funder rather than between a litigant and a lawyer. In broad terms, the litigant will pass to the funder some or all of the responsibility for the ongoing legal cost of taking a case to trial. The litigant may also purchase ATE ("after the event") insurance to cover any adverse costs order if the case fails. The funder will take an active interest in the case but will not

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from