Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 SEPTEMBER 2018

Data Protection In Japan To Align With GDPR

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Contributor
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

Skadden has become a go-to firm in the German legal market since opening our doors in Frankfurt in...

View firm profile
Explore more from Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP

On July 17, 2018, less than two months after the GDPR went into effect, Japan and the European Union agreed to recognize each other's data protection regimes as providing adequate protections for personal data.

JapanPrivacy
Michihiro Nishi
Michihiro Nishi

On July 17, 2018, less than two months after the General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR) went into effect, Japan and the European Union agreed to recognize each other's data protection regimes as providing adequate protections for personal data. The European Commission said in a press release that the move will create "the world's largest area of safe data flows." Once finalized, these "reciprocal adequacy" decisions will allow personal data to flow between companies in Japan and the EU without being subjected to additional safety checks. From a European perspective, Japan will be recognized as having "adequate safeguards" in place for data protection, meaning that specific transfer agreements with Japanese entities may no longer be required.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

Amendments To The Act On The Protection Of Personal Information Promulgated

Japan has enacted sweeping amendments to its Act on the Protection of Personal Information, introducing an administrative surcharge regime with monetary penalties for data protection violations, new protections for children under 16 and biometric data, and expanded exceptions for data utilization in statistical analysis and AI development. The reforms, which take effect in stages through 2028, fundamentally reshape Japan's privacy enforcement landscape by granting the Personal Information Protection Commiss
JapanPrivacy
A&O Shearman
A&O Shearman
Article

New York City’s Click-to-Cancel Rule: What Businesses Need To Know

New York City has enacted the nation's first municipal click-to-cancel rule, requiring businesses to provide clear disclosures, simple cancellation processes, and advance renewal notices for subscription services. With approximately 30 states already implementing similar regulations and the federal landscape in flux following the FTC's vacated rule, companies now face an increasingly complex patchwork of compliance obligations. The rule takes effect October 1, 2026, and imposes penalties ranging from $525 t
United StatesConsumer Protection
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

Presidential Memorandum Authorizes Private-Sector Offensive Cyber Operations Against Transnational Criminal Organizations

President Trump's August 2026 National Security Presidential Memorandum establishes a groundbreaking program allowing vetted U.S. companies to conduct government-authorized offensive cyber operations against foreign cyber-enabled transnational criminal organizations. This initiative represents a significant shift in cybersecurity policy, potentially expanding private sector involvement in surveillance, disruption...
GlobalTechnology
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

US Government Announces New Iran Sanctions Measures

The U.S. government has dramatically expanded Iran-related sanctions through new sectoral determinations, entity designations, and the suspension of key authorizations, while simultaneously targeting third-country financial institutions that facilitate Iranian transactions. These measures significantly broaden secondary sanctions risks across aviation, digital assets, gold, shipping, and technology sectors, marking a comprehensive escalation in economic pressure against Iran and its international networks.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

OCC And FDIC Finalize Standards For Unsafe Or Unsound Practices And MRAs

The U.S. Office of the Comptroller of the Currency and the FDIC have issued a joint final rule redefining "unsafe or unsound practice" and establishing new standards for matters requiring attention (MRAs) in bank supervision. How will these changes, which prioritize material financial risk over procedural deficiencies, reshape the regulatory landscape for financial institutions when they take effect in November 2026?
United StatesFinance and Banking
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Podcast

Analyzing NRSC v. FEC: What The Supreme Court’s Ruling Means For Parties, PACs And Donors (Podcast)

The Supreme Court's decision in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC has fundamentally altered the landscape of political party spending by eliminating federal limits on coordinated expenditures between parties and candidates. This ruling preserves existing campaign finance guardrails while potentially reshaping the power dynamics of party committees, joint fundraising operations, and various political action committees.
United StatesGovernment, Public Sector
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Article

The SEC’s ‘Hands-Off’ Policy Alters The Calculus For Excluding Shareholder Proposals

The SEC staff's decision to stop reviewing shareholder proposal exclusions has fundamentally altered the risk calculus for companies. While this hands-off approach initially appeared to give companies more freedom, it has introduced new challenges including heightened litigation risk, potential bylaw-based proxy contests, and reputational concerns that boards must carefully weigh when deciding whether to exclude proposals from their proxy statements.
United StatesCorporate/Commercial Law
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP
Skadden, Arps, Slate, Meagher & Flom LLP