Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 MARCH 2025

Trade Mark Similarity – Monsters And Rat Pacs

Regular readers know that we like to write about trade mark similarity and likelihood of confusion cases from around the world.

JapanIntellectual Property

Regular readers know that we like to write about trade mark similarity and likelihood of confusion cases from around the world. In this article, we continue our love affair with virtual globe-trotting and discuss a case in Japan as well as one in the EU.

Japan: The Monster case

The case that we're discussing, Monster Energy v Pocket Monsters (aka Nintendo), was a trade mark opposition.

1592716a.jpg

*Image credit: Wikimedia Commons

The facts

In 2022, Nintendo filed an application in Japan to register the trade mark POCKET MONSTERS in a wide range of classes, namely 3, 9, 14, 16, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 30 and 41. For the benefit of those who do not live and breathe trade marks, this basically means that Nintendo was seeking to protect its trade mark for a very wide range of goods and services, including electronic goods, sporting goods, clothing and entertainment services.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from