Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 MARCH 2019

Imposing Instructions On A Direct Importer To Support Parallel Import

Last year, the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, passed a reform to Israeli competition law.

IsraelAntitrust/Competition Law

Last year, the Israeli parliament, the Knesset, passed a reform to Israeli competition law. The newly legislated section 31f (a) of the Economic Competition Law, 1988 (formerly the Restrictive Trade Practices Law, 1988), enables the Israeli Antitrust Commissioner (the "Commissioner") to impose instructions on a Direct Importer. Such instructions do not imply a prior violation of the law. In addition, such instructions can only be imposed if the Commissioner finds that, as a result of the Direct Importer's status or behavior, there is concern of significant harm to parallel or private import, and, as a result, significant harm to competition in the relevant sector.

Recently, The Israeli Competition Authority ("ICA") announced that it started a first hearing procedure to apply section 31f, in the matter of Shestowitz, who is Colgate's representative in Israel, and distributor of the Colgate toothpaste brand.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from