Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 APRIL 2013

Trustees’ Mistakes – The Story Continues

In the recent case of In The Matter of The Representation of RBC Trust Company (Jersey) Limited And In The Matter of The B Life Interest (2012) JRC 229, the Royal Court of Jersey has again considered whether the doctrine of mistake can apply to voluntary dispositions made by a trustee. In the recent case of In The Matter of The Representation of RBC Trust Company (Jersey) Limited And In The Matter of The B Life Interest (2012) JRC 229, the Royal Court of Jersey has again considered whether t

Isle of ManTax

In the recent case of In The Matter of The Representation of RBC Trust Company (Jersey) Limited And In The Matter of The B Life Interest (2012) JRC 229, the Royal Court of Jersey has again considered whether the doctrine of mistake can apply to voluntary dispositions made by a trustee.

The Court confirmed that Jersey law has diverged from English law on the question of whether a voluntary disposition made by a settlor can be set aside. For more information on that issue, please click here to see DQ's previous article on the S Trust case

However, the Jersey Court confirmed in cases of trustee mistake that Jersey law will follow English law and the reformulation of the Hastings-Bass principle, as set out in the case of Pitt v Holt.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from