Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 SEPTEMBER 2025

Is Insolvency Different? (Updated)

In 2004, the Isle of Man court in Re Impex[1]decided that the court had a common law power to co-operate with and assist other courts in relation to insolvency matters.

Isle of ManInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Introduction

In 2004, the Isle of Man court in Re Impex1 decided that the court had a common law power to co-operate with and assist other courts in relation to insolvency matters. The scope of that power has since been examined at the highest judicial levels.

In 2006, during oral submissions in the hearing before the Privy Council in Cambridge Gas2 (a corporate insolvency case) Counsel argued that "insolvency is different". In that spirit, the Privy Council departed from established principles of private international law in order to assist the US bankruptcy court.

In 2012, the Supreme Court in Rubin3 considered that insolvency is insufficiently different to upset established principles of private international law, which it said would be to legislate, and that Cambridge Gas was wrongly decided.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from