Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2010

Ignore Pre-Action Letters at Your Peril!

Mayer Brown
Mayer Brown
Contributor
Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown

Mayer Brown is a leading international law firm positioned to represent the world’s major...

View firm profile
Explore more from Mayer Brown

The ruling in Wong Shui Lam v. Hospital Authority (HCPI 151/2009) sends a message that failure by the defendant to respond to a claimant's pre-action letters may result in adverse costs orders on an indemnity basis.

Hong KongInsurance

Originally published 25 January 2010

Keywords: Wong Shui Lam, pre-action letters, adverse costs, indemnity, Civil Justice Reform

Summary

The ruling in Wong Shui Lam v. Hospital Authority (HCPI 151/2009) sends a message that failure by the defendant to respond to a claimant's pre-action letters may result in adverse costs orders on an indemnity basis.

Full Update

Background

The Plaintiff sustained personal injury whilst in the employ of the Defendant. The Labour Department issued a summons against the Defendant for failing to ensure the safety and health of its employee. The Defendant was convicted and the Plaintiff subsequently commenced common law proceedings.

The Defendant conceded liability before the Check List Review hearing and judgment was made in favour of the Plaintiff on liability with damages to be assessed, with costs to the Plaintiff. The Plaintiff, however, applied for a costs order on an indemnity basis.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from