Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 APRIL 2013

A Question Of Costs

Collas Crill
Collas Crill
Contributor
Collas Crill

Collas Crill

Firm Details: Chief Executive Officer: Jason Romer Managing Partners: Bermuda: Lilla Zuill, BVI:...

View firm profile
Explore more from Collas Crill

In a last year decision the Court of Appeal of Jersey has clarified the principles relating to the payment of costs in non-adversarial trust applications.

GuernseyWealth Management

Background

In Trilogy Management v YT [2012] JCA 204 the Court of Appeal of Jersey has clarified the principles relating to the payment of costs in non-adversarial trust applications. In so doing, it has drawn together approaches established in a number of early cases and consolidated the position in an area which it said had previously received only "sporadic consideration".

This case is relevant to any trustees that are contemplating non-adversarial applications to the court such as the correct administration of a trust. The case is significant because the Court distinguishes between the costs of trustees and beneficiaries or other convened parties, as well as between costs at first instance and costs on appeal.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from