Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 28 FEBRUARY 2018

Careless Talk Costs - You Never Know Who's Reading

Walkers
Walkers
Contributor
Walkers

Walkers

Firm Details Global Managing Partner: Ingrid Pierce Office Managing Partner: Daniel Wood Number of...

View firm profile
Explore more from Walkers

When negotiating difficult trust matters, candid correspondence can lower temperatures and enable parties to work constructively to resolve disputes.

GuernseyLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

When negotiating difficult trust matters, candid correspondence can lower temperatures and enable parties to work constructively to resolve disputes.

One way to share information safely during disputes is the use of Without Prejudice communications. Such correspondence ordinarily attracts privilege from production in court. As a matter of public policy this allows information to be provided to and shared between the parties involved in a dispute without fear that that information might be used against them in court later.

There are, however, situations when a party might wish to disclose Without Prejudice correspondence in court, for example when a trustee might be under a duty to make full and frank disclosure. This tension between protection and duty necessitates careful thinking before corresponding under the cloak of Without Prejudice privilege. To that end a recent Royal Court case has considered the status of Without Prejudice correspondence in the context of

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from