Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 JUNE 2026

Trusts: When Protectors Fail

Collas Crill
Collas Crill
Contributor
Collas Crill

Collas Crill

Firm Details: Chief Executive Officer: Jason Romer Managing Partners: Bermuda: Lilla Zuill, BVI:...

View firm profile
Explore more from Collas Crill

Protectors of discretionary trusts sometimes find themselves in the unfortunate position of being asked by a beneficiary, or class of beneficiaries, to resign for reasons that are not always justified.

GuernseyCorporate/Commercial Law

Protectors of discretionary trusts sometimes find themselves in the unfortunate position of being asked by a beneficiary, or class of beneficiaries, to resign for reasons that are not always justified. 

However, a stark example of when it was indeed time to step down was addressed in the judgment of the Royal Court of Guernsey (the Court) in Bernheim v Krummenacher & Ors, dated 8 August 2025.1

The Court did not hesitate to grant the sole beneficiary's application for the removal of the first and second respondents as the Class A Protectors of the Billevese Trust (the Trust) and the appointment of a highly experienced fiduciary as the replacement Class A Protector. Following judgment on the substantive relief sought, the parties agreed that the usual indemnity afforded to protectors should be disapplied and that the Class A Protectors should pay the applicant's costs on an indemnity basis.2

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from