Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 20 MARCH 2026

Import Of Sigma Constructores, S.A. v. Republic Of Guatemala

Aceris Law
Aceris Law
Contributor
Aceris Law

Aceris Law

Aceris Law is a leading boutique international arbitration law firm. It provides the...

View firm profile
Explore more from Aceris Law

The enforcement of arbitral awards against sovereign states in the United States is governed by a carefully structured statutory framework rooted in the New York Convention..

GuatemalaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The enforcement of arbitral awards against sovereign states in the United States is governed by a carefully structured statutory framework rooted in the New York Convention, and its implementation through Chapter 2 of the Federal Arbitration Act and the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act of 1976 (FSIA). An arbitral award, although binding, does not automatically carry the force of a United States court judgment. To pursue recovery against assets located in the United States, the prevailing party must seek judicial confirmation of the award, the process by which a federal court recognises the arbitral award and converts it into an enforceable domestic judgment. When a sovereign opposes that confirmation, the dispute moves from the arbitral forum into a formal judicial setting in which treaty commitments and sovereign immunity principles define the scope of the court's authority.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from