As part of our series looking at the potential impact of recent
cases on the future decisions of the Cayman Islands and the BVI
Courts relating to crypto assets, we consider the recent English
decision of Tulip Trading Limited v Bitcoin Association
for BSV and others [2022] EWHC 141 (Ch), and specifically
whether cryptocurrency is likely to be accepted by the Courts as a
form of security.
The claimant in Tulip Trading requested that
the form of security it be required to provide be cryptocurrency in
circumstances where providing cash would be onerous for the
claimant. The claimant proposed that it transfer this
cryptocurrency to its legal counsel including an additional 10%
buffer to account for the potential change in the price of the
cryptocurrency between the time it was transferred and when it may
be required to settle the defendant's legal costs. The
cryptocurrency offered by the claimant was Bitcoin Satoshi Vision
or Bitcoin Core. Notwithstanding the 10% buffer