Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 08 JANUARY 2026

Do U.S. Courts Have Jurisdiction Over Maduro's Criminal Case?

Katten
Katten
Contributor
Katten

Katten

With client service at our core and a collective desire to foster an inclusive environment for a...

View firm profile
Explore more from Katten

The recent U.S. military action in Venezuela, in which U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores on January 3, 2026...

GlobalLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The recent U.S. military action in Venezuela, in which U.S. forces captured Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro and his wife Cilia Flores on January 3, 2026 and transported them to the United States to stand trial in the Southern District of New York, raises a plethora of domestic and international legal issues. These complex issues involve Venezuelan sovereignty, the legality of the use of force, potential head-of-state immunity, and the scope of executive power absent Congressional authorization. The action has been condemned by various members of Congress and multiple foreign governments, and the U.N. Security Council has been in session over the ensuing crisis.

Interestingly, under longstanding U.S. Supreme Court precedent known as the Ker-Frisbie Doctrine, U.S. courts have jurisdiction over Maduro and Flores, notwithstanding the highly irregular manner in which they were brought to this country. Issues of international law and Congressional authority do not

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from