Log in or register
Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 14 FEBRUARY 2024

Case In Point: Is Maintenance The Hidden Game Changer?

Alvarez & Marsal
Explore more from Alvarez & Marsal

Much like the game of football, when it comes to maintenance everyone thinks they are an expert, but only a few get to play in the Champions League. Because of this, companies often fall short.

GlobalFinance and Banking
Daniel Partsch
Daniel Partsch
Steven Gorse
Steven Gorse
Viktor Szabo
Viktor Szabo

Much like the game of football, when it comes to maintenance everyone thinks they are an expert, but only a few get to play in the Champions League. Because of this, companies often fall short. If we take a closer look at manufacturing companies, there are several reasons why their underperforming maintenance has a significant impact on EBITDA.

Most of these correlations are hidden, and only the effect of indirect labor and maintenance, repair and operations (MRO) costs are obvious. A short-term action to cut these costs can have an immediate and positive impact on the profit and loss (P&L) statement; however, if we take a mid- to long-term view the story will be very different.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

Register for freeORLog in

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

View source

Related Articles

Legal Intelligence Newsletters: sign up for the latest legal and regulatory news on your chosen topics

Read more about

Related Comparative Guides

See more popular content from

Article

From Rulebook To Market Architecture: MiCAR 1.0, The Emerging MiCAR 2.0, MISP And The EU–UK–US Divide

The Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation (MiCAR) was designed to bring crypto-assets within a common EU regulatory perimeter, but recent developments reveal a more complex picture. Three decisive developments in October 2026—the Council's position on the Market Integration and Supervision Package, the MiCAR review consultation responses, and ESMA's supervisory action—expose critical gaps in how digital money, tokenised financial instruments, and market infrastructure fit together.
European UnionFinance and Banking
PwC Legal Germany
PwC Legal Germany
Article

MiCAR 2.0: Reading The Further ESMA, ESRB, AMLA And SRB Responses Together

European financial regulators ESMA, ESRB, AMLA, and SRB have published responses to the EU's Markets in Crypto-Assets Regulation review, proposing reforms across classification, market conduct, financial crime controls, and crisis management. The responses raise critical questions about crypto-asset service providers' permissions, client rights, and operational continuity during participant failures. Firms face three immediate priorities: remediating non-compliant stablecoin services by early 2027, testing
GermanyFinance and Banking
PwC Legal Germany
PwC Legal Germany
Article

MISP Moves Into Political Negotiation: What More Than 1,900 Amendments Mean For The EU’s Future Market Architecture

The European Parliament has tabled over 1,900 amendments to the Market Integration and Supervision Package, transforming it from a straightforward proposal into a complex negotiation between competing models for European market supervision and infrastructure. As the Commission's original December 2025 proposal becomes obsolete and multiple parliamentary drafts emerge with conflicting visions, financial firms face critical questions about which supervisory architecture will ultimately govern their licenses
GermanyFinance and Banking
PwC Legal Germany
PwC Legal Germany