Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 30 MARCH 2023

Challenging Jurisdiction In Complex International Fraud Claims

Fieldfisher
Fieldfisher
Contributor
Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher

Fieldfisher is a European law firm with market-leading practices in many of the world’s most...

View firm profile
Explore more from Fieldfisher

In so doing, the judgment provides a detailed insight into the Court's approach to such challenges and the issues upon which an application challenging the English Court's jurisdiction might turn.

GlobalCriminal Law

In the recent case of Re Harrington and Charles Trading Co Ltd (in Liquidation) [2023] EWHC 307 [Ch], the High Court had to grapple with the Defendants' challenge to the English Court's jurisdiction in an alleged billion-dollar fraud spanning multiple jurisdictions and a complex web of entities.

In so doing, the judgment provides a detailed insight into the Court's approach to such challenges and the issues upon which an application challenging the English Court's jurisdiction might turn.

The Facts

The case was one of extraordinary complexity. It begins with two Indian companies ("W" and "FP") which entered into "Precious Metal Facility" agreements with eight banks in 2008 (the "Bullion Banks"), which were essentially loan credit facilities for the banks to supply bullion when drawn down by W and FP, which were repayable within 270 days. In turn, in 2009, those drawdowns of bullion were securitised by a consortium of Indian banks via a joint working capital

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from