Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 APRIL 1995

Current Tax Developments - Speculation

FranceAccounting and Audit

The Paris Court of Appeal has jugded (C.A. Paris March 18, 1994, Locatelli vs. Goy-Hauvette) that a financial intermediary has an obligation to warn its clients of the risks associated with excess speculative investments on the Paris "Matif".

As a consequence, the court considered that the intermediary could be held liable when it:

- did not give its client precise information on the envisioned operations and on the related risks ;

- did not warn its client of the risks incurred by its client as a result of investments which were becoming more and more risky on a high risk market ;

- while, pursuant to the contract concluded with the client, the intermediary had an obligation to call margins on a daily baisis if necessary, it had called the said margins two months after the first debit balance created by the client's investments.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from