Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 JANUARY 2006

Legislation on Prospectus Liability Proposed to be Amended

Roschier
Roschier
Contributor
Roschier

Roschier

Roschier is one of the leading law firms in the Nordic region with offices in Helsinki and...

View firm profile
Explore more from Roschier

The Ministry of Finance recently issued the Report of the Prospectus Liability Working Group (the "Report") concluding that the current Finnish laws regulating prospectus liability are insufficient mainly because of lack of clarity and that they need to be revised.

FinlandFinance and Banking
Dimitrios Himonas
Dimitrios Himonas

The Ministry of Finance recently issued the Report of the Prospectus Liability Working Group (the "Report") concluding that the current Finnish laws regulating prospectus liability are insufficient mainly because of lack of clarity and that they need to be revised. Legislative reforms based on the proposals in the Report are not expected until 2007.

Strict liability for misstatements or omissions in a prospectus has been rejected in the Report in favor of an approach based on negligence and a "business judgment" rule which reverses the onus of proof: issuers and underwriters would be liable for the accuracy of the information contained in the issuer's prospectus, to the extent that the issuer and/or underwriter could not prove that it had acted diligently when providing information in the prospectus. In a prospectus for the secondary sale of the issuer's existing securities, the above prospectus liability would attach to the issuer in respect of prospectus disclosure regarding the

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from