Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 11 JUNE 2018

Arbitration - Nori Holdings v Bank Okritie

That was because it was held that an anti-suit injunction would undermine the effectiveness of the Regulation.

European UnionLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

Case Alert - [2018] EWHC 1343 (Comm)



Court holds that English Court cannot grant anti-suit injunction to restrain proceedings in another Member State court, which were brought in breach of an arbitration agreement

One of the issues in this case was whether the claimant could obtain an anti-suit injunction to restrain the pursuit of court proceedings in a Member State (Cyprus) which it alleged were brought in breach of an arbitration agreement.

Regulation (EC) 44/2001 provides that where proceedings involving the same cause of action and between the same parties are brought in the courts of different Member States, the Member State court first seised of proceedings must hear the case. The ECJ decisions in Gasser v Misat (2003) and Turner v Grovit (2004) established that the English courts cannot grant an anti-suit injunction where another Member State is first seised of proceedings, even if that breaches an exclusive jurisdiction clause (although it is

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from