Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 17 AUGUST 2018

Environment & Planning Group Update July 2018 - European News

In a judgment issued on 25 July 2018, the CJEU followed the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev and held that although measures in a management plan would at a minimum maintain and also potentially increase...

European UnionEnvironment

EUROPEAN DEVELOPMENTS

Edel Grace and Peter Sweetman v An Bord Pleanála (C-164/17)

In a judgment issued on 25 July 2018, the Court of Justice of the European Union ("CJEU") followed the earlier Opinion of Advocate General Tanchev and held that although measures in a management plan would at a minimum maintain and also potentially increase the amount of suitable habitat available for a protected species they could not be classed as mitigation measures and thereby be included in an appropriate assessment carried out under Article 6(3) of Directive 92/43/EEC (the "Habitats Directive") to determine whether the plan or project would adversely affect the integrity of the site.

The judgment can be found here.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from