Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 MARCH 2026

Ethiopia's Automatic Stay (Revised Commercial Code) vs. Bank Foreclosure Rights: A Comprehensive Legal Analysis

Ethiopia's 2021 Commercial Code introduced a modern, rescue-oriented insolvency framework — most notably, a general automatic stay that freezes "individual enforcement actions" once reorganization proceedings enter the observation period

EthiopiaInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

Ethiopia's 2021 Commercial Code introduced a modern, rescue-oriented insolvency framework — most notably, a general automatic stay that freezes "individual enforcement actions" once reorganization proceedings enter the observation period. At the same time, Ethiopia's bank-collateral foreclosure regime — Property Mortgaged or Pledged with Banks Proclamation No. 97/1998 (as amended) — continues to empower banks (where contractually authorized) to sell mortgaged or pledged property by auction after at least 30 days' prior notice, without first obtaining a court judgment.

When a distressed borrower files (or plans to file) for reorganization, these two regimes collide in practice:

Debtors invoke the Commercial Code's stay as a shield to stop foreclosure. Banks invoke Proclamation No. 97/1998 as a special, speed-oriented enforcement track designed to protect depositors' money and financial stability.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.