Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2024

Market Intelligence Thought Leadership Award Winner

Balancing Innovation And Regulation: A Detailed Analysis Of The AI Act

Elias Neocleous & Co LLC
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC
Contributor
Elias Neocleous & Co LLC

Elias Neocleous & Co LLC

Elias Neocleous & Co LLC (ENC) is among the largest firms in southeast Europe and the Eastern...

View firm profile
Explore more from Elias Neocleous & Co LLC

The EU's new regulatory framework on AI is doubtlessly a pioneering legislative framework that could set a global benchmark, but does it strike the right balance between protection and innovation?

CyprusTechnology

The EU's new regulatory framework on AI is doubtlessly a pioneering legislative framework that could set a global benchmark, but does it strike the right balance between protection and innovation? Addressing the risks that AI technologies present to people's safety and fundamental rights is of major importance, but so is the need to foster AI innovation in the EU and the uptake of these transformative technologies that could help reinvigorate the EU economy. To be sure, most AI systems are expected to qualify as low/minimal risk and should thus not be (materially) affected by the new rules. On the other end, some AI applications that present unacceptable risks will now be banned while those classified as high-risk will be subject to a particularly heavy regulatory burden. In other words, the administrative burden of this Regulation predominantly falls on entities classified as providers of systems that qualify as high-risk AI systems.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from