Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 18 JULY 2019

Supreme Court examines Article IV Of New York Convention Overturning First Instance Judgment

Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C
Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C
Contributor
Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C

Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C

Soteris Pittas & Co LLC is a boutique law firm, in size only, focusing on the areas of law relating...

View firm profile
Explore more from Soteris Pittas & Co L.L.C

In a recent Supreme Court case, the court examined whether the first instance judge as was the allegation of the appellants, erroneously concluded that the requirements under Article IV(1)(a) were not fulfilled.

CyprusLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In a recent Supreme Court case, the court examined whether the first instance judge as was the allegation of the appellants, erroneously concluded that the requirements under Article IV(1)(a) were not fulfilled. Particularly the first instance court stated that a duly authenticated original has not been submitted as the authenticity of the signatures and the seal of the arbitral tribunal had not been certified. In fact, what the appellants submitted was as they argued a duly authenticated original of the arbitral award since it bore the tribunals seal and the signature of the arbitrators.

The Supreme Court on the other hand reversed the decision of the First Instance Court relying amongst others on the case of Antony Lombard-Knight ν Rainstorm Pictures Inc (2014) EWCA Civ 356, in which the court held that an arbitral award is authentic when the document includes the original signatures of the arbitrators. Therefore, the conclusion of the Supreme Court was that since

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from