In a recent Supreme Court case, the court examined whether the
first instance judge as was the allegation of the appellants,
erroneously concluded that the requirements under Article IV(1)(a)
were not fulfilled. Particularly the first instance court stated
that a duly authenticated original has not been submitted as the
authenticity of the signatures and the seal of the arbitral
tribunal had not been certified. In fact, what the appellants
submitted was as they argued a duly authenticated original of the
arbitral award since it bore the tribunals seal and the signature
of the arbitrators.
The Supreme Court on the other hand reversed the decision of the
First Instance Court relying amongst others on the case of Antony
Lombard-Knight ν Rainstorm Pictures Inc (2014) EWCA Civ 356, in
which the court held that an arbitral award is authentic when the
document includes the original signatures of the arbitrators.
Therefore, the conclusion of the Supreme Court was that since