Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 FEBRUARY 2025

The Use Of Artificial Intelligence In Cayman Islands Legal Proceedings: A Conversation Between Spencer Vickers And A Computer

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

In the 28 January 2025 judgment in Bradley & anor v Frye-Chaikin [2025] CIGC (Civ) 5, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands addressed the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by a party in the preparation of written submissions.

Cayman IslandsTechnology

In the 28 January 2025 judgment in Bradley & anor v Frye-Chaikin [2025] CIGC (Civ) 5, the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands addressed the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) by a party in the preparation of written submissions.

While noting that there is nothing inherently wrong about using technology to make the conduct of legal disputes more efficient, the Court made clear that the user of such tools must take responsibility for the accuracy of the material produced. Justice Asif observed that:

"As the use of AI tools in the conduct of litigation increases, it is vital that all counsel involved in the conduct of cases before the courts are alive to the risk that material generated by AI may include errors and hallucinations. Attorneys who rely on such material must check it carefully before presenting it to the court. But equally, opponents should be astute to challenge material that appears to be erroneous, as was the case here. As officers of the Court, in my

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from