Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 02 JULY 2015

Consequences Of Keeping Minority Shareholders Out In The Cold

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

This case is the subject of an appeal.

Cayman IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

The case of Tempo Group Limited & Ors v Fortuna Development Corporation & Ors1  centred on a dispute between the three principal owners of Fortuna Development Corporation ("Fortuna"), a Cayman Islands incorporated holding company.  The main issues in question were whether the three owners had agreed that one of them, Dr Chen, was to be guaranteed a seat on the board of directors and whether his subsequent removal from the board at the extraordinary general meeting ("EGM") was valid.  On the first point, the Court found that there was no agreement which entitled Dr Chen to a position on the board.  However, Dr Chen was re-instated to the board because the EGM at which he was removed was found to be a nullity.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from