Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 13 APRIL 2018

Appealing Appraisal Actions: New Judgments From The Cayman Courts

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

Instead each party bears the burden of proving the value for which it contends, and relies on the Court to finally determine the fair value.

Cayman IslandsLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

 A well-known and now widely used part of local legislation, Section 238(8) of the Cayman Islands Companies Law (the "Companies Law"), entitles a shareholder who dissents from a merger or consolidation of a Cayman company under the statutory merger provisions contained in Part XVI of the Companies Law to be paid "the fair value of his shares". Disputes about how to determine "fair value", both in terms of procedure and calculation methodology, have been voluminous over the past eighteen months or so, and have resulted in a sharp increase in the number of fair value appraisal actions before the Grand Court of the Cayman Islands (the "Grand Court").

Flowing from that litigation, and adding to the growing jurisprudence on this front, the Cayman Islands Court of Appeal (the "CICA") has recently released a number of highly anticipated decisions concerning various interlocutory issues arising in the course of litigation of this nature. The most important of the judgments

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from