Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 22 MARCH 2021

To BII Or Not To BII – A Cayman Islands Perspective

Conyers
Conyers
Contributor
Conyers

Conyers

For over 25 years Conyers’ London office has provided time-zone sensitive advice and support to our...

View firm profile
Explore more from Conyers

On 15 January 2021, the United Kingdom Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the appeals in the Business Interruption Insurance (BII) test cases between the UK's Financial Conduct Authority and...

Cayman IslandsInsurance

On 15 January 2021, the United Kingdom Supreme Court delivered its judgment on the appeals in the Business Interruption Insurance (BII) test cases between the UK's Financial Conduct Authority and eight UK insurance companies.

The Supreme Court's judgment is reported as Financial Conduct Authority v Arch Insurance (UK) Ltd and Ors [2021] UKSC 1, and it has been widely reported in the media, and in insurance industry publications.

The Supreme Court's judgment has clarified, under English law, whether or not a variety of insurance policy wordings cover BII losses resulting from the COVID-19 pandemic, and from the public health measures taken by UK authorities in response to the pandemic from March 2020.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from