Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 29 DECEMBER 2021

Security For Costs In Cayman Islands Proceedings – The Impecuniosity Factor

Maples Group
Maples Group
Contributor
Maples Group

Maples Group

The Maples Group, through its leading international law firm, Maples and Calder, advises global...

View firm profile
Explore more from Maples Group

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal ("CICA") in Traded Life Policies Fund (In Official Liquidation) ("TLPF") & Anor v Jeremy Leach et al confirmed that where the plaintiff's want of means (impecuniosity)...

Cayman IslandsInsolvency/Bankruptcy/Re-Structuring

The Cayman Islands Court of Appeal ("CICA") in Traded Life Policies Fund (In Official Liquidation)  ("TLPF") & Anor v Jeremy Leach et al1 confirmed that where the plaintiff's want of means (impecuniosity) was brought about by the defendant's own conduct (the "Impecuniosity Factor"), this factor alone can, in certain circumstances, be capable of forming a standalone defence to an application for security for costs. Whether this standalone defence is available is highly fact sensitive, but importantly, the CICA has provided useful guidance which can be applied to future cases. This brings greater certainty to an area of the law where previously there was at least a perception of conflicting guidance from the courts.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from