Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 12 AUGUST 2019

Unwelcome Conduct: Key Takeaways From Friend Decision

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

As a result, the Directors and their spouses feared for their safety.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Special thanks to Sarah DeGenova who assisted with the preparation of this article.

In a recent case, the Ontario Superior Court of Justice provided guidance on the duties that Boards of Directors ("Boards") and Property Managers have to protect workers from workplace harassment and to ensure there are no unsafe conditions which could cause harm to persons.

In Ottawa Carleton Standard v. Friend, 2019 ONSC 3899, the condominium corporation (the "Corporation") brought a motion to prohibit Mr. Friend from communicating with and harassing its Directors, their spouses, its own contractors and employees.

Mr. and Mrs. Friend originally purchased a unit in 2006. The Court found that since that time, Mr. Friend has repeatedly exhibited egregious conduct, which "clearly demonstrate[d] the need for court intervention."

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from