A recent Ontario Superior Court decision from April
2022, Louis Jones Construction Ltd. v.
Rocque, 2022 ONSC 2362, adds to the
line of cases dealing with motions brought under Section 47 of
Ontario's construction lien legislation to discharge an
expired lien. In dispute in this case was the operation of the
transition provisions in Section 87.3 of
Ontario's Construction Act, RSO 1990, c
C.30 (“Act”).
Despite procedural differences, motions under Section 47 of
Ontario's lien legislation are similar to motions for summary
judgment under Ontario's Rules of Civil
Procedure (the “Rules”) from
the perspective of the underlying test. Both involve consideration
of whether or not a “triable issue” exists in respect
of an issue in dispute. In the case of Section 47 motions to
discharge a lien (which are defensive in nature, because they do
not provide a means for the plaintiff to obtain judgment), the
court needs to determine whether there is “a triable issue in
respect to