Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 FEBRUARY 2023

Section 47 Motions Under Ontario's Lien Legislation

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A recent Ontario Superior Court decision from April 2022, Louis Jones Construction Ltd. v. Rocque, 2022 ONSC 2362, adds to the line of cases dealing with motions brought under Section 47...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

A recent Ontario Superior Court decision from April 2022, Louis Jones Construction Ltd. v. Rocque, 2022 ONSC 2362, adds to the line of cases dealing with motions brought under Section 47 of Ontario's construction lien legislation to discharge an expired lien. In dispute in this case was the operation of the transition provisions in Section 87.3 of Ontario's Construction Act,  RSO 1990, c C.30 (“Act”).

Despite procedural differences, motions under Section 47 of Ontario's lien legislation are similar to motions for summary judgment under Ontario's Rules of Civil Procedure (the “Rules”) from the perspective of the underlying test. Both involve consideration of whether or not a “triable issue” exists in respect of an issue in dispute. In the case of Section 47 motions to discharge a lien (which are defensive in nature, because they do not provide a means for the plaintiff to obtain judgment), the court needs to determine whether there is “a triable issue in respect to

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from