Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 09 MARCH 2026

Permit Issued, Enforcement Optional: Novel Conservation Authorities Act Ruling Highlights Courts As The Only Backstop

McMillan LLP
McMillan LLP
Contributor
McMillan LLP

McMillan LLP

The firm : McMillan LLP is one of Canada’s leading national law firms with offices in Montreal,...

View firm profile
Explore more from McMillan LLP

In Husack v. Long Point Region Conservation Authority ("Husack"), the Ontario Superior Court on January 5, 2026 issued a decision with significant implications for landowners, developers, and municipalities dealing with Conservation Authorities.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

In Husack v. Long Point Region Conservation Authority ("Husack"), the Ontario Superior Court on January 5, 2026 issued a decision with significant implications for landowners, developers, and municipalities dealing with Conservation Authorities. The Court upheld the position of the Long Point Region Conservation Authority ("LPRCA") that, even when a permit holder disregards the terms of a Conservation Authority permit, the Authority is generally not legally required to enforce compliance.1

The Court confirmed that the enforcement powers under the Conservation Authorities Act (the "CAA") are discretionary rather than mandatory.2 When an Authority chooses not to act, affected parties may have no statutory appeal route under the CAA and must rely on the courts as their sole avenue of recourse.3

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The foregoing provides only an overview and does not constitute legal advice. Readers are cautioned against making any decisions based on this material alone. Rather, specific legal advice should be obtained.

© McMillan LLP 2025

See more popular content from