Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 16 DECEMBER 2024

New Rules For Construction Contracts: How The Earthco Decision Affects Your Business

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

In Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v Pine Valley Enterprises Inc., 2024 SCC 20 (Earthco), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) made a significant shift in the interpretation of exclusion clauses in contracts.

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

In Earthco Soil Mixtures Inc. v Pine Valley Enterprises Inc., 2024 SCC 20 (Earthco), the Supreme Court of Canada (SCC) made a significant shift in the interpretation of exclusion clauses in contracts. Prior to Earthco, statutory warranties could only be excluded through clear and specific contractual language, as established in the landmark case of Hunter Engineering Co. v Syncrude Canada Ltd., 1989 CanLII 129 (SCC). This long-standing precedent required explicit wording to waive statutory warranties.

The Earthco decision, however, introduces a new approach, focusing on the objective intent of the contracting parties. Now, even in the absence of explicit language, a statutory implied warranty can be excluded if the broader context of the contract demonstrates that the parties intended such an exclusion. For construction professionals, this ruling redefines the way warranty clauses should be drafted and interpreted, offering both opportunities and risks when

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from