Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 07 MARCH 2025

How Not To Exercise An Option To Purchase Land

Blaney McMurtry LLP
Blaney McMurtry LLP
Contributor
Explore more from Blaney McMurtry LLP

The recent Court of Appeal decision in 1785192 Ontario Inc. and 1043303 Ontario Ltd. v. Ontario H Limited Partnership provides useful guidance on the rules around the exercise of options to purchase land where the price...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

The recent Court of Appeal decision in 1785192 Ontario Inc. and 1043303 Ontario Ltd. v. Ontario H Limited Partnership provides useful guidance on the rules around the exercise of options to purchase land where the price to be paid is to be set in accordance with appraisal evidence.

In this case, a tenant under a pair of commercial leases wished to purchase the properties that it occupied. Each lease contained an option to purchase which provided that the purchase price would be the midpoint of appraisals to be obtained by each party.

The parties each obtained an appraisal. They were far apart. The tenant's appraiser suggested a value of $11,746,000. The landlord's appraiser put the value at $31,200,000. The midpoint, therefore, was $21,473,000.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be ought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from