Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 27 FEBRUARY 2020

Hawkins: The Oppression Remedy, Charge Backs And Condo-Wide Work

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

Condominium corporations are uniquely placed to encounter collective action problems. Each condo unit is individually owned, but they share much of the same infrastructure and that infrastructure

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

Condominium corporations are uniquely placed to encounter collective action problems.  Each condo unit is individually owned, but they share much of the same infrastructure and that infrastructure connects with collectively owned infrastructure.

TSCC 1696 encountered one of these situations when it found out that it needed to replace its pipes.  The decision of Justice O'Brien is in Hawkins v. TSCC 1696, 2019 ONSC 2560.

The Facts

In 2016, the corporation became aware that the building, including individual units, had been constructed using Kitec pipes, which were known to fail.  The board determined that it was necessary to replace the pipes to avoid water damage. It negotiated a single contract for replacement of the pipes and then sent notice to owners allowing them to opt out.

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

The content of this article is intended to provide a general guide to the subject matter. Specialist advice should be sought about your specific circumstances.

See more popular content from