Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 01 AUGUST 2016

Agricultural Law NetLetter - Thursday, July 7, 2016

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has granted summary judgment, dismissing a claim for damages based on the Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

HIGHLIGHTS

* A justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has granted summary judgment, dismissing a claim for damages based on the Rule in Rylands v. Fletcher resulting from alleged odours and seepage emanating from farmland following the application of "biosolids". The Court observed that the spreading of "biosolids" as well as fertilizer/nutrients/pesticides did not constitute a "non-natural" use of property and that there was no evidence that either the biosolids or the odour could be considered a "dangerous product". However, the Court also refused to grant summary dismissal of the same claim based on negligence, trespass or nuisance. The Court observed that there might be evidence to establish contaminated materials had seeped from the farm to neighbouring property; that compliance with Ministry of Environment standards alone might not rule out a negligence claim, and that odours could be subject to a claim in nuisance. The Court commented on different

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from