Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 21 DECEMBER 2016

Agricultural Law Netletter - December 7, 2016 Issue 361

Miller Thomson
Miller Thomson
Contributor

Miller Thomson

Miller Thomson LLP ("Miller Thomson") is a national business law firm with approximately 500...

View firm profile
Explore more from Miller Thomson

A Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has reviewed and explained the basic principles of contract with respect to whether individual farmers, or their corporation...

CanadaReal Estate and Construction

HIGHLIGHTS

* A Justice of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice has reviewed and explained the basic principles of contract with respect to whether individual farmers, or their corporation, are liable for a supplier's debt, and the basis upon which interest can be claimed by a supplier. Credit applications completed by the farmers were hopelessly ambiguous, however they did refer to a corporate name. The Court found that this was sufficient to bring home to the supplier that it was dealing with a corporation. The Court also found that a contract to pay interest had been established based on the provisions of a credit application and numerous invoices. The case contains a discussion of the case law and a number of principles involved in resolving both issues. (Huron Bay Co-operative Inc. v. Needham, CALN/2016-029, [2016] O.J. No. 6170, Ontario Superior Court of Justice)

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from