Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 19 JANUARY 2016

Tower Dump Production Orders: Restricting Police Access To Cellular Records In R v. Rogers Communications

Gowling WLG
Gowling WLG
Contributor
Gowling WLG

Gowling WLG

The firm The firm’s lawyers speak English, French, Russian and Ukrainian. The firm’s client base...

View firm profile
Explore more from Gowling WLG

In his decision in R v. Rogers Communication, Justice Sproat of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice used this innocuous hypothetical to illustrate the privacy interest that the Canadian public may have...

CanadaPrivacy

Introduction

"Was the person at the Blue Jays game instead of at work?"  In his decision in R v. Rogers Communication1, Justice Sproat of the Ontario Superior Court of Justice used this innocuous hypothetical to illustrate the privacy interest that the Canadian public may have in their cellular telephone records.  In an age where the towers accessed by cellular telephones can indicate the user's geographic location to those with access to the data, an unauthorized day at the park can turn into seriously unwanted attention if there is a cellular telephone in your pocket.  But playing hooky from the office should be the least of the fears of the general public when it comes to police access to the records of cellular towers as part of an investigation. 

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from