Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 10 SEPTEMBER 2006

Summary Of Pipeda Review Discussion Paper

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP
Contributor
Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

As one of Canada’s top business law firms, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP (Blakes) provides...

View firm profile
Explore more from Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has issued a Discussion Paper identifying a number of areas as warranting consideration in the upcoming five year review of Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA).

CanadaMedia, Telecoms, IT, Entertainment

Article by Mark Hayes & Christina Schwarz, © 2006, Blake, Cassels & Graydon LLP

Originally published in Blakes Bulletin on Privacy Law, August 2006

The Privacy Commissioner of Canada has issued a Discussion Paper identifying a number of areas as warranting consideration in the upcoming five year review of Canada’s Personal Information Protection and Electronic Documents Act (PIPEDA). While the Commissioner quite properly notes that it is not her role to draft proposed amendments to PIPEDA, the Discussion Paper is an important first step in the review process.

Areas of potential reform identified by the Commissioner which may be of particular interest to businesses are as follows:

The Privacy Commissioner’s powers

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from