Share on LinkedInShare on LinkedIn

ARTICLE · 03 NOVEMBER 2017

Securities Class Actions – Underwriter Duty Of Care: LBP Holdings V. Hycroft Mining

Torys
Torys
Contributor
Torys

Torys

Torys LLP is an international business law firm that works with clients who expect the best advice...

View firm profile
Explore more from Torys

In LBP Holdings Ltd. v. Hycroft Mining Corporation, 2017 ONSC 6342, the Ontario Superior Court declined to certify a securities class action brought against underwriters ...

CanadaLitigation, Mediation & Arbitration

In LBP Holdings Ltd. v. Hycroft Mining Corporation, 2017 ONSC 6342, the Ontario Superior Court declined to certify a securities class action brought against underwriters1 on the basis the common law claim of negligence failed to disclose a cause of action and a class proceeding was not the preferable procedure.

What You Need To Know

  • This is the first reported Canadian case on the issue of whether underwriters owe investors who purchase securities under a prospectus a common law duty of care. The decision held that underwriters do not owe a general duty of care to prospective investors, either to perform due diligence or to properly price shares.
  • The decision also applied the Supreme Court of Canada's 2013 direction2 regarding class action certification of common and individual issues, in considering the important issue of whether a lone common law misrepresentation claim against investors should be certified (it should not).

We operate a free-to-view policy, asking only that you register in order to read all of our content. Please login or register to view the rest of this article.

See more popular content from